<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software</title>
		<link>http://www.kubernetes.co.uk/2006/05/05/the-boundaries-and-language-of-digital-media-and-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kubernetes.co.uk/2006/05/05/the-boundaries-and-language-of-digital-media-and-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 09:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kubernetes.co.uk/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to define &#8220;Digital Content&#8221;?
At one level it could be seen simply as the electronic media; on-line print, television and radio which extends to include mobile ringtones, video clips and games.
Gaming is a very interesting example as it blends two distinct disciplines; software development and video production. In the gaming industry the two are intimately [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to define &#8220;Digital Content&#8221;?</p>
<p>At one level it could be seen simply as the electronic media; on-line print, television and radio which extends to include mobile ringtones, video clips and games.</p>
<p>Gaming is a very interesting example as it blends two distinct disciplines; software development and video production. In the gaming industry the two are intimately linked, so, in this case, is software part of digital content?</p>
<p>The answer is &#8220;it depends&#8221;. In the gaming example then the answer is probably yes but, taking it to the other extreme, the firmware that operates a digital watch is probably not.</p>
<p>Some insight came from the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dti.gov.uk/technologystrategy/key_technology_areas.html">DTI&#8217;s Technology Strategy event</a> last week where their ICT stream presentations referred to &#8220;Digital Communications&#8221;, yet the documents that the DTI have produced on this seem to refer to Telecommunications. It immediately seemed to me a bit bizzare investing taxpayers money in research in Telecommunications as the industry is maturing and is dominated by US, Chinese and Japanese mulitnationals.</p>
<p>In conversation, it became clear that they were really looking to co-ordinate and maximise the value of research into what they called &#8220;the upper layers of the protocol stack&#8221; i.e. applications and content. At the time it made sense to refer to this as &#8220;digital communcations&#8221;, but then I checked the wikipedia entry on protocol stacks and the application layer is of course things like HTTP!</p>
<p>Confused?&#8230;.. You will be</p>
<p>However, using &#8220;Digital Communications&#8221; as a broad term to to describe the combination of software and content that &#8220;new media&#8221; has become, works for me. In the 21st century knowledge is communicated between people in digital form through content and delivered using software over the telecoms infrastructure.</p>
<p>My only reservation is perhaps the term still too broad and ill-defined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kubernetes.co.uk/2006/05/05/the-boundaries-and-language-of-digital-media-and-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

